A- A+
Media Releases

786 Spices Pte Ltd fined $2,000 for operating a non-retail food business without a licence

icon-calendar

16 Jun 2025

 

             786 Spices Pte Ltd was fined $2,000 by the Court today for processing and supplying meat, fish, and vegetable products at an unlicensed premises.

2            On 21 August 2024, Singapore Food Agency (SFA) officers inspected the company’s premises at 20 Neythal Road and found the processing of meat, fish, and vegetable products within the premises for supply to a food stall. The company is not licensed to conduct any food processing activities or supply food. More than 800kg of food products were seized, including processed vegetables and frozen seafood.  

1f7bba47-c571-4daf-9a50-b0cf5e72bed7

Chest freezers with unlicensed storage of food products (Photo: SFA)

3          Illegal food processing and supply of food from unlicensed facilities pose a food safety risk. In Singapore, all food processing establishments must be licensed and are required to meet SFA’s requirements and food safety standards. These licensed establishments are also routinely inspected by SFA. Offenders who illegally process and supply food products shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 and, in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $10,000, or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months, or both. 

 

 


 

Issued by the Singapore Food Agency
16 June 2025

 

We welcome your feedback
Help us improve your experience on SFA's revamped corporate website by doing a 5-minute survey.
Which of the following best describes you?

Check any that apply:

Which of the following best describes the reason for your visit to our website?
Were you able to locate the information or services you needed today?

Please tell us why.

Please tell us why.

What is your overall satisfaction level with our website?

Very dissatisfied

Very satisfied

Availability of Content / Information

Very dissatisfied

Very satisfied

Ease of Navigation

Very dissatisfied

Very satisfied

Visual Design
How would you rate our website when compared to other government websites?

Very poor

Very good

Availability of Content / Information

Very poor

Very good

Ease of Navigation

Very poor

Very good

Visual Design
Do you have any other feedback or suggestions to improve our website?
0
/ 200
Back to Top icon

Top